- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
| Wednesday, November 12, 2008 | (153 comment(s))
Adding to Susan Doria's Nov. 6 comments on the ramifications of abortion, including infanticide, additional statistics and future effects are as follows:
* Since the Supreme Court legalized abortion in 1973, nearly 50 million unborn children have been murdered.
* Supreme Court Justice Stevens is 88 and is expected to be replaced during the first term of President Obama.
* Obama's clear position on abortion will directly result in the selection of a liberal judge thus retaining the 5-4 imbalance of the court favoring abortion.
* The Supreme Court will continue with Roe v. Wade as the law of the land for perhaps another 35 years with other justices replaced during Obama's tenure of eight years.
* The impact of Obama will add possibly another 50 million unborn children murdered in the next 35 years with the expected liberal Supreme Court.
To quote Mother Teresa: "America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation."
Paul Burns, Schererville
Back to story 153 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.
Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.
» More Letters To The Editor Stories


abortion isnt murder morons wrote on Nov 18, 2008 2:30 PM:
educate yourselves. "
Personally Pro-Life Politically Pro-Choice wrote on Nov 18, 2008 2:07 PM:
The pro-choice stance is so often misunderstood and misrepresented by the pro-life contingent. Most pro-choicers find a terminated pregnancy to be a sad thing. We don't celebrate abortion. It is a very troubling and complex issue.
It's easy to say that murder is murder. If it were that simple, this wouldn't be an issue.It's a question of constitutional rights. At what point in gestation does a fetus get rights? Conception? Heartbeat? At what point do those rights overtake the rights of the mother growing the child? Is it a good idea to give the government power over women's bodily choices? Slippery slope.
I don't claim to have the answers. I just ask that prolifers try understanding the opposing viewpoint more. Respect our views as we respectyours. "
to Joe Average wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:59 PM:
If they were just out to "help women" (LOL) they would donate their profits to adoption agencies. They might even have adoption agencies right in their offices to give women a real choice.
No, the only option Planned Parenthood gives is: abortion today or next Thursday? MasterCard or Visa? (or Medicare?) "
Joe Average wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:42 PM:
You can charge for abortions, but you have to turn the money over to adoption agencies.
The sale off the fetal tissue to cosmetic companies is banned.
No profit from abortion. Period.
There, I bet Planned Parenthood wouldn't be so benevolent now would they?
I bet the people and organizations that buy and sell fetal tissue would freak and tell us how research cannot be done and shampoo and mascara products will be made in back alleys, bla, bla.
I bet the "doctors" (former nazi's) that previously profited from the carnage would stop "offering their services to those unfortunate women who excercise their constitutional "choice" bla bla.
Of course if we stopped abortion and realized that guns don't cause crime, then what will we argue about?
Probably some other issues we will never solve (like how Americans seem to think that (reproduction) is a team sport - or spectator sport in some cases). "
to planned parenthood wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:39 PM:
Planned parenthood does not give all the options. They won't show a woman an ultrasound of her baby, or let her listen to the baby's heartbeat, because they don't want the mother to understand that it's a real baby. No abortion, no profit for Planned Parenthood. Do you also believe that used car salesmen try to give buyers all "options" of maybe taking the train to work or the bus?
Yes I do blame the workers in Planned Parenthood as much as I blamed the guards in the Nazi prison camps. They are just "following orders" and doing their jobs. "
to Kathy wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:35 PM:
Then some other pro-abortion fanatic said "we need to leave the judging up to God!" as if that made any sense.
Kathy, I don't agree with a lot of crimes, like bank robbery and child abuse. For me anyway, "just not doing it myself" isn't enough. I think we should have laws to punish those who kill, rob banks or abuse children.
And "we need to leave the judging up to God"? Really? So if we are at the grocery store and a masked man comes in and shoots the checkout person, we need to let him go and just "leave the judging up to God!"?
Try to think first before posting non-nonsensical statements. Thank you. "
re to Kathy wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:16 PM:
planned parenthood wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:02 PM:
not your responsibilty wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:57 PM:
re Hansel wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:48 PM:
to Darien wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:48 PM:
Stanley wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:40 PM:
I would like to close, for now, with this. Why are ultrasound images not offered to women seeking abortions? Why have brainwashed women described unborn children as blood clots? I have never heard of a blood clot with arms legs and a heartbeat. These women do not know what they are doing. They are being kept ignorant. Just tell the seekers of “family planning” services the truth. All women should be required to understand the stages of development of their child before a “procedure” can be performed. I think this would drastically reduce the number of abortions. "
Stanley wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:40 PM:
For the adoption and foster home thing. It should be my right to stop feeding my kids and if you are not willing to feed them you have no right to say anything to me about it. Sound ridiculous? It is the same thing as telling a lifer if they are not willing to adopt your poor decisions they have no right to speak up about you making an even worse decision.
As for the death penalty. I personally do not support it but I do not see a conflict of interest for those who are anti-abortion yet DO support the death penalty. How can you compare the death of an innocent child to the death of a convicted criminal? This is how I put it. Everyone should have a chance to screw up...continued "
To Kathy wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:34 PM:
Kev wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:21 PM:
every intercourse(between a man & woman of course) should result in a baby!! "
leave the judging up to Him wrote on Nov 18, 2008 11:35 AM:
Kathy wrote on Nov 18, 2008 10:17 AM:
Re Darien wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:39 AM:
Hansel confused wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:27 AM:
I guess Hansel would also say that a mother killing her child in her bed at night with a sharp knife, would be equivalent to accidentally killing the child in an auto accident?
Come on, Hansel, THINK! "
Darien wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:25 AM:
I said this earlier, but absolutely no response from the pro-lifers.
While I believe abortion is a sin, it is between the woman and God. "
Schmiggy is confused wrote on Nov 18, 2008 7:44 AM:
Yes, true. Armed home invasion would end in the death of my children. Therefore I am pro-life to stop the bad guy with a gun before he kills.
Schmiggy, you think you are "pro-life" to sit by passively while you and your family are murdered?
Schmiggy says "nobody really WANTS to see another being die". I'm not so sure about that. NARAL and Planned Parenthood want more to die because they make a profit on each abortion.
Guns don't kill. People who enter my house to kill might be killed.
War has liberated millions around the world, has stopped Hitler, and is stopping al qaeda and has stopped Saddam Hussien from using any more WMD on his own people or against Americans.
Both boys and girl babies are killed from abortions. So it is not specific to one gender.
Your argument that we should kill more babies because some of them might become gay is sick. Homosexual behavior is an abomination, but that doesn't give you the right to kill babies "
Hansel wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:51 AM:
Pro-lifer wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:46 PM:
I think people who cannot obey the law should have no rights to own guns. But I believe law abiding citizens should have the right to own guns and to use guns for the enjoyment of target shooting, for hunting, and for protection.
I am not pro-war. But I know that there are people who do not see eye to eye who think that extermination or dominion of entire populations is the only answer, and sometimes declaring war is the only way to protect those people.
No, I am not a proponent of the death penalty. I think it is an abomination that even one innocent person or one repentant soul has been put to death. The death penalty was more acceptable to me when there was no guarantee that a prisoner could not escape and reoffend, but we are now completely capable of housing a prisoner until his or her natural death, so the death penalty is unnecessary.
I think that every implanted embryo has the right to life and that right to life supercedes a women's right to her own body.
Thanks for asking! "
to Kat wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:46 PM:
So you would call the police so they could properly wrap up the dead bodies and fill out the proper forms? Or would you defend your family on the spot and save their lives?
Or did you mean "YES" you have a problem with America defending itself against evil terrorists? So you would have just let Hitler kill all the Jews and take over the world? So you will just let radical Islamic terrorists like al quaeda kill us and take over the world? Or will you fight to defend freedom and safety? "
morality wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:17 PM:
Schmiggy wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:10 PM:
Also, I am just wondering why any man should have any sort of a say in this matter t all since thye will NEVER find themselves in the position of being pregnant.
Additionally, I really wonder how "pro-life" peopple would feel if all those aborted babies had been born & were gay. Would you still say that it was god's will??? "
to Kat wrote on Nov 17, 2008 6:39 PM:
end of story wrote on Nov 17, 2008 6:34 PM:
to 50 MILLION wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:49 PM:
to Kat wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:49 PM:
I am Pro-Life: it's immoral and against the constitution to kill innocent baby girls and boys in the womb. Their hearts are beating and they feel pain, and they did nothing.
Q: are you also Pro Gun?
Yes, I believe in the God-given right to self-defense. No crazy nut has the right to kill me and my family. If he tries, I will stop him with force. You have a problem with that, Kat?
Q: Pro War?
No I am not pro-war. But I am in favor of using force to stop evil nations and groups from killing innocent people. Have you ever heard of Hitler and the Holocaust? We stopped him with war. Have you ever heard of 9-11? 3000 innocent people killed, al quaeda plans to kill more. We are stopping them with war. Any questions?
Q: Pro Capital Punishment?
If a guy rapes small children and a mother, then tortures them and strangles them, and is caught red handed, tried and convicted beyond any doubt, and is sentenced to death, I am OK with that. Liberals want him released to do it to someone else. "
Kat wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:15 PM:
harvey danger wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:08 PM:
50 MILLION wrote on Nov 17, 2008 3:51 PM:
true patriot wrote on Nov 17, 2008 3:24 PM:
mean while, we're an overpopulated planet with nothing but idiots having kids that shouldn't be reproducing.
soilent green is people! "
To End Of End wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:45 PM:
Stanley wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:27 PM:
ROOO wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:21 PM:
DannyH wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:05 PM:
Lanie wrote on Nov 17, 2008 1:45 PM:
You're choice is made before the conception. That is the main reason I could never vote for a democrat-they are all liberal! "
WHY wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:57 PM:
Thoughts wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:10 PM:
I think the idea of better education and more availability of cheaper birth control would be a good step. Those of you who think abortion is used as birth control are wrong. People use it when there are birth defects with the child that would cause the child horrible pain or death soon after birth. They use it when they can't support another child, even after they have used birth control. It's used in cases of rape. There isn't just one reason for it. If you want it to end, you need to start changing the things that cause women to get abortions. Eliminate that, you can eliminate abortion. "
re to Mary wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:10 PM:
to Mary wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:42 AM:
why do you think that gives you the freedom to kill an innocent baby girl or boy growing in the womb, who feels pain?
America guarantees our God given right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The first right is LIFE. Stop trying to take that away from innocent chidren.
And in Obama'a case, he also wants to take the right to life away from babies who are born alive, breathing outside the womb. Obama fought HARD against giving them medical care. See bornalivetruth.org for the details. "
And Also Seriously wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:39 AM:
Mary wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:18 AM:
annie wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:17 AM:
Why is murder just legal for unborns then? "
End of END wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:59 AM:
Once wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:58 AM:
Seriously wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:54 AM:
Hey End wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:21 AM:
JH wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:57 AM:
To joel... wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:46 AM:
Hey End wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:40 AM:
SJT wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:33 AM:
ScottFromCP wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:30 AM:
Question: if Michelle Obama wanted to end her first pregnancy, would Barack have supported her? I think not.
Pro-choicers can say what they want, but abortion will ALWAYS be murder - period. "
headline wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:22 AM:
reduce the demand wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:14 AM:
end of story wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:01 AM:
Just a thought wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:06 PM:
Many would-be abortions would be headed off by increased and more responsible use of other birth control methods in the absence of the abortion back-up plan. "
Nontheist wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:04 PM:
Think People wrote on Nov 16, 2008 6:02 PM:
Yeah? And I wonder how many of those "children" would have ended up as a child abuse statistic.
I truly hope that nobody here believes that the outlawing of abortion would result in an onslaught of adoptions to "loving homes." That's a naive fantasy at best, and complete ignorance at worst.
Think about how many children are abused now by parents and caretakers who don't want them now, even though they had the option of abortion - do you really think outlawing abortion would result in people suddenly giving up babies for adoption? I won't beat the "quality of life" dead horse, because I would hope that everyone here is smart enough to understand its importance.
Obama isn't out to promote abortion, that's an ignorant piece of rhetoric. He advocates education and pregnancy prevention. Abortion isn't a cakewalk, and if more women made smart choices about their bodies and lives, it would become nearly a non-issue. "
sigh wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:51 PM:
Um, in other news, the overturning of Roe vs. Wade only means that abortion laws are then up to the individual states, which many states have already done. It's not like an Obama presidency is going to result in billions of abortions. People hear "abortion" and start thumping bibles and hopping on high horses, with no regard for common sense. "
Oh geeezz wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:21 PM:
Disgusted wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:23 PM:
First things first wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:07 AM:
Church and State wrote on Nov 15, 2008 9:11 PM:
I understand, the "Pro Choicers" are all about the idea that government should not dictate what a woman does to her body. It's not necessarily the act of the abortion they are "for"; but rather the right to do whatever they want with their bodies. I agree with the concept of keeping government out of dictating what procedures are allowed, but I recall a doctor in Michigan being arrested for assisted suicides. What is the difference between what he did and what a "pro choicer" does with regard to abortion? Same end result... "
Don Dodge wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:33 PM:
Hahahahaha wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:15 PM:
Med Tech wrote on Nov 15, 2008 11:49 AM:
Question: when we reach that point in our science, should we harvest those aborted fetuses and grow them in the lab, regardless of the financial and social costs involved? Would the religious right object to using science to replace their god's method of creating life? Would it be ethical to bring a 'motherless' child into the world, solely for the purpose of preserving the life of the fetus?
Personally, I believe it would be wrong to preserve the life of the fetus in vitro. I also believe a woman should not be forced to give birth in vivo when an alternative solution is available to her. How could these two positions be reconciled?
Answer: they can not be reconciled. With few exceptions, abortion will always remain the preferred method of terminating a pregnancy. Get used to it! "
mother of 3 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 11:33 AM:
purduedavie wrote on Nov 15, 2008 10:52 AM:
Tangent wrote on Nov 15, 2008 9:16 AM:
My body wrote on Nov 15, 2008 8:18 AM:
A child developing in the womb should have at least the same Rights as, say, a person renting an apartment. I mean, the child is not going to be in utero for ever, just a limited time. Why not let the child stay until his/her lease is up? "
Regular Joe wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:46 AM:
“ ‘Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion’ means no law forcing the belief held by SOME Christian denominations…”
Actually, we do both all the time. “Thou shall not kill” - seems that that has a religious basis. The movement to end slavery was led by Christians in the 19th century, both here and abroad.
Does that mean that since Christians believe that killing and slavery are wrong that all laws in the United States regarding the illegality of both practices should be stricken from the books?
We live in a culture where the only thing that’s important is what makes ME happy regardless of what it does to other people or to our society at large. Unfortunately such a culture doesn’t, can’t, give true happiness but only generates loneliness, isolation and the frenetic search for pleasure that, in the end, destroys happiness. "
joel wrote on Nov 15, 2008 1:58 AM:
Bob wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:43 AM:
Secondly, it shows how stupid law makers and politicians are. They just lost 50 million potential voters.
Immigration, if we had 50 million more legal americans guess what why come here when you have no job to come to. "
Whats next wrote on Nov 14, 2008 5:03 PM:
abortion will never go away wrote on Nov 14, 2008 4:51 PM:
Proud Mother wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:52 PM:
To all the women that are mothers that support abortion, shame on you. You, of all people, should realize just how precious life is. "
Susan wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:41 PM:
to re Its not pro life wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:32 PM:
Rights Responsibility wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:26 PM:
When a woman has intimate relations she is CHOSING the possibility of having a new life growing inside her. (I am NOT talking about rape, abuse, incest, etc.)
When a woman is pregnant, she is the incubator or the housing for that new life growing inside her. It is her RESPONSIBILITY to be the caretaker for that life. As such, she needs to protect the environment (her body) by good nourishment (no drugs, alcohol, etc) and a healthy lifestyle. She does NOT have the right to "clean up her mistakes" by sweeping the womb clean. Only God has that right.
To all of you staunch supporters of abortion & pro-choice: It's too bad your own mothers weren't so adamant about sucking the new, growing life out of their bodies. Too bad YOUR OWN MOTHERS weren't so hell-bent on MURDERING INNOCENT BABIES. "
to Laura wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:46 PM:
Similarly, if McCain had been elected, innocent children might have had a chance to live. And babies born alive might get medical care. So, a single party is to blame for the problems of millions of people. We all need to work together to stop Obama.
It is black and white for the innocent boys and girls in the womb. They want to live. Obama says no. "
Dear God wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:32 PM:
Laura wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:23 PM:
to 68 Mo Days til downgrade wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:01 PM:
Bush's eight years did bode well for the economy, education, our health, foreign policy, social security, the environment, civil rights, human rights, New Orleans, Iraq, Darfur, Sudan, Don Rumsfeld and our future. Seems we are getting an inexperienced socialist in office, that is the problem.
After the bursting of the tech bubble and the 9/11 attacks, George Bush lowered tax rates across-the-board for individuals and investors. For five years the stock market rallied without interruption — the longest bull market without a correction in post-WWII history — while the economy expanded for six years, a bit longer than the average post-war recovery cycle.
Recently we have seen trouble in the financial markets and the economy due to liberals forcing bank to give loans to people who can't pay them. Obama will bring us deeper into a recession, if not a depression if he follows his socialist ways. "
Re You cant be... wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:23 PM:
To Relieved wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:06 AM:
68 Mo Days wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:39 AM:
relieved wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:18 AM:
Darien wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:14 AM:
What do you mean by this? You are against killing unborn babies, but you are not for saving someone’ life by giving them medical care? There is something fundamentally wrong with this philosophy.
Yes, health care is available, but if you don’t have some sort of medical insurance, you can be denied treatment. It has nothing to do with taking from the rich and giving to the poor. As a Christian, I believe that this nation – the most progressive, humanitarian in the world, does not offer some type of health care assistance to those who need it.
How many of these kids will grow up in poverty and abuse? How many will turn out to be abusers and even murderers?
Although I do not necessarily agree with abortion, I disagree with the do-gooders who try to impose their will on others, yet are against helping the really needy? Why not ban alcohol; how many lives does drunkenness take each year? Tobacco products? Illegal drugs? Over-eating?
BTW, how will you help? "
Pray for what wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:04 AM:
You cant be... wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:02 AM:
ToJoe Average wrote on Nov 14, 2008 5:01 AM:
I remember wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:35 PM:
The other friends family flat out rejected her, and told her to get an abortion and not shame the family name. Up to that point, I always thought her parents were cool, but I never thought of them the same since. Why kill a grandchild? "
john boy wrote on Nov 13, 2008 6:31 PM:
Abortion is legal and it going to stay that way.
Nobody cares that you feel sorry for the fetus. "
Obama rally wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:40 PM:
The tee-shirt guy saw them and started chanting "Free dead baby with every Obama tee shirt!, Free dead baby with every Obama tee shirt!"
Other Obama supporters started laughing and a few joined in the chant.
This is the Obama supporter. Callous to life, callous to the unborn, aggressive in their stance that more babies need to die, and if Barack Obama can get a lot of campaign cash from Planned Parenthood, so much the better. Then he can put in Supreme Court justices that will ensure more killing.
I turned around and went home crying for my country. That changed my vote...actually I did not vote because I did not want Obama's infanticide on my conscience. "
to blank wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:28 PM:
In that case, why should we care if someone goes down the street and kills the clerk at the grocery store or the bank teller during a robbery? After all, the bank robber will have to live with the decision they make, not us.
So we should just sit back and take "bank robbery" and "killing clerks during robbery" laws off the books right? In fact maybe we could have a nice Supreme Court decision that says during certain trimesters, it's OK to kill certain store clerks as long as the killer does it with sterile instruments and the clerk would have caused him mental distress. "
to Darien wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:24 PM:
Answer: yes, we are. Stop killing them.
How about health insurance?
Answer: yes, McCain had a good plan to get health insurance to all, using the market economy and freedom. Obama has a plan that involves socialism and taking from successful people and giving free health care to others.
Either way, health care is available. Is THAT your only excuse for killing baby boys and girls in the womb?
So no, they are not on their own once they pop out of the womb. We are hear to help them. Just stop killing them, they are innocent and never did anything to harm you. "
to GRBarkley wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:12 PM:
So when you kill the baby with a beating heart in the womb, he or she feels pain and it is he or she who is killed, not the mother.
We need to think about the poor innocent babies, not the convenience of the mother and father. "
to God Introduces Legislation wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:06 PM:
Why can't we just have nice peace and quiet while we kill the babies? Why do you always have to try to make us feel bad about killing innocent babies? Just shut up and let us kill in peace and quiet. Thank you. "
to its not pro-life its pro-women-having-babies wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:02 PM:
Yes, liberals want pro-gay and pro-promiscuous s*x ed for our grade school kids, but that won't work.
There are plenty of adoption help centers around, and plenty of families that will take an unwanted child, there is no reason to kill her.
I am also against the radical Islamofacists killing of innocent people (both US Citizens and not) in the middle east. That is why we are fighting to stop them from killing any more innocent people. The terrorists killed 3000 innocent Americans on 9-11-01. They must be stopped before they launch another attack that would kill 30,000 or 300,000 next time.
I know the lefties are for weakness and appeasement, pacifism and surrender, but remember, PACIFISM IN THE FACE OF AGGRESSION IS SUICIDE! "
Duenwalker wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:51 PM:
If John Gacy's mother had had an abortion...
See how sill the "what if's" are? "
to to Mike wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:39 PM:
I will join you in a prayer campaign, asking our Lord to please put an end to abortion, and stop the evil abortion supporters like Planned Parenthood who gave big bucks to Obama and Democrats to enact laws to protect their abortion profits.
I will also pray for an end to the murder and rape of innocent people, which deserves the death penalty.
I will also pray for an end to the inane Islamofacists and others who start wars throughout the world, where so many innocent babies die daily.
I pray that America's brave soldiers will stop these killers from killing any more of our innocent people. Just as I would pray for a policeman to stop the killing if a bank robber started shooting up innocent bank customers. I would not stand by and blame the cops and say "Gee, God, please stop these cops from killing the bad guys and also stop the robbers" "
to 50 million homeless kids better wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:32 PM:
You say "Think about the children".
OK what about all the kids in orphanages then? There is a chance they might not have a perfect life right? So according to you, we should just off them all, just in case they might not have a great life.
This disrespect for life is just sick. "
Pro-life gram wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:31 PM:
to Geezer wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:29 PM:
If you could live in a slightly smaller home and save an innocent child's life, would you do it? Or are you selfish, "me first and screw the innocent kids! Let them die!"
Many lives are damaged by botched jobs when someone attacks their spouse with a knife, also. Many lives are damaged when someone tries to kill a bank teller to get money.
Does this mean we should make the killing of one's spouse, or armed bank robbery, legal?
Of course not. Killing innocent unborn children is wrong, just as wrong as any other murder. "
to Barnett Slepian MD wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:24 PM:
Up to what age do you think we should allow mothers to kill their children? "
None of your business wrote on Nov 13, 2008 2:52 PM:
Because wrote on Nov 13, 2008 2:26 PM:
To First Amendment wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:57 PM:
dk wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:50 PM:
First Amendment wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:07 PM:
kathy wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:56 AM:
wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:38 AM:
To Pro-Choice wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:51 AM:
Lorie wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:47 AM:
This world is messed up! "
To taxpayer wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:23 AM:
Not disagreeing with your post... "
Darien wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:18 AM:
How about health insurance?
I guess they are on their own once they pop out of the womb. "
Hope Re Pro-life wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:31 AM:
Freedom of Speech wrote on Nov 13, 2008 6:56 AM:
More to it wrote on Nov 13, 2008 5:01 AM:
I just don't understand why her "Choice" doesn't lie with CHOOSING whether or not to have intimate relations which can lead to pregnancy in the first place, RATHER than her CHOICE of when to abort.
Finally, for those of you who are still under the impression that a fetus is not a life, then I ask you, "What is it?" It is the early stages that lead to a CHILD. A Baby. A Person. I don't know how much more REAL that can be. "
Pro-life wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:24 AM:
Proper respect wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:41 PM:
by that logic wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:33 PM:
And if Mrs. Hitler had had an abortion... "
Paul wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:41 PM:
God has a purpose for everyone, even the un-wanted.
It's all about perspective. ProLifers see babies as potential for greatness, where as Choicers see babies as a drain. "
Respect wrote on Nov 12, 2008 7:43 PM:
Re GRBarkley wrote on Nov 12, 2008 6:13 PM:
Castration? I don't think so. But men have to admit they are creating this problem and they need to take action to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. It is entirely within their power to do it. "
mike wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:55 PM:
Mike wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:33 PM:
GRBarkley wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:20 PM:
Donnie wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:13 PM:
mike wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:07 PM:
Let god decide wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:59 PM:
Josh a 7th grader wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:37 PM:
Dr Kavokian wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:17 PM:
Re its not pro life wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:00 PM:
Rev. Cleophus Washington wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:58 PM:
God Introduces Legislation wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:41 PM:
Joe Average wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:41 PM:
Is it easier to accept the brutality of abortion by referring to a baby in development as a fetus instead of a baby?
What have we come to with our bloodlust that we allow parrtial birth abortion? What sadistic animal would even conceive of such a thing much less do it? We're sick.
There would not be 50 million abortions or unwanted BABIES if people didn't treat reproduction so cavalierly. There is only one cause for pregrancy and 99.999% of the time it can be avoided by thinking of something or someone other than yourself. For the other .001% there have been mornng after pills issues by doctors in ER's following treatment for rape.
Why doens't anyone ever hold themselves or others accountable for their actions any more?
We're all a bunch of selfish narcisists. "
its not pro-life its pro-women-having-babies wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:33 PM:
Also, how many of you pro-lifers also support the killing of innocent people (both US Citizens and not) in the middle east? Further proof that all you really care about is keeping the women oppressed. "
to Mike wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:11 PM:
mike wrote on Nov 12, 2008 9:53 AM:
50 million homeless kids better wrote on Nov 12, 2008 9:20 AM:
Think about the children. There is no way they could all be loved and cared for. The mothers will just punch themselves or use a coathanger, so then you'll have *two* deaths over *your* head. "
Geezer wrote on Nov 12, 2008 9:13 AM:
Apparently you aren't old enough to remember when it was thought illegal.
How many females were damaged for life because of a botched job.
If you know someone who is planning an abortion counsel them and offer to adopt their unwanted child. "
A personal choice wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:41 AM:
david wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:36 AM:
MHO wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:24 AM:
Wouldn't it be great if more people could emulate Mother Teresa and just be quiet. Pray in silence and let your god worry about abortion. After all, It is all powerful and doesn't need your help, so just be quiet and let It do It's job. "
voter wrote on Nov 12, 2008 7:49 AM:
TAX PAYER wrote on Nov 12, 2008 7:38 AM:
Intelligent Thinking Woman wrote on Nov 12, 2008 6:20 AM:
There are of course, unwanted pregnancies, but murder is never the answer. "
Barnett Slepian MD wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:49 AM:
Eric Ruldolph wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:36 AM: