Today's Deal Promo Box - hi lites

Login or Signup

Facebook user?
You can use your Facebook account to log in.
Join The Community
Login | Register | Subscribe
 

Indiana Supreme Court threatened following controversial ruling

Indiana Supreme Court threatened following controversial ruling
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

INDIANAPOLIS | Indiana State Capitol Police are investigating harassing phone calls and email messages directed to the Indiana Supreme Court following a controversial ruling issued last Thursday.

Police would not say how many calls and messages have been received or whether they were addressed to a specific justice. But the communications are being reviewed as part of a criminal harassment investigation, police said.

Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathryn Dolan said the threats contained in the calls and emails were "primarily" directed at police officers.

"We obviously want to protect the safety of our employees and alert police to individuals who might be dangerous, so we contacted Capitol Police," Dolan said. "Because they are investigating, I am not able to give more specific information."

On Thursday, the state's high court ruled that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes -- eliminating a common law right dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215.

In a 3-2 decision written by Justice Steven David, appointed to the bench last year by Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, the Supreme Court said a person confronted with an illegal police entry into his home should not physically resist. Instead, the person should later sue for damages in the court system.

"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."

Justice Robert Rucker, a Gary native, and Justice Brent Dickson, a Hobart native, dissented from the ruling, saying the court's decision was too broad and runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Copyright 2012 nwitimes.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Print Email

Sponsored Links

Current Conditions
31° F
Sponsored by:
Promo Banner - iPad App

Latest Local Offers

Toyota Of Merrillville
3 year lease, 12,000 miles per year. 2011 Rav 4 $219/ month
Toyota Of Merrillville
Chicago Health & Fitness
24 HOUR GYM offering group and aerobic exercises, personal training, state of the art equipment, family membership discounts and babysitting.
Chicago Health & Fitness
Levin Tire Center
$24.95 Oil Change w/4 Tire Rotation Special...
Levin Tire Center
All Around Seamless Gutters & More
10% OFF full gutter installation!
All Around Seamless Gutters & More
Discount Transmission LLC
FREE Towing with Most Auto Repairs!
Discount Transmission LLC

Featured Businesses

Hint: Enter a keyword that you are looking for like tires, pizza or doctors or browse the full business directory, powered by Local.com

Poll

Should government officials who deliberately disobey public access laws be subject to civil fines?

Loading…
Yes
No