GUEST COMMENTARY: Obamacare is turning doctors into bureaucrats

2014-03-08T00:00:00Z 2014-03-14T19:47:17Z GUEST COMMENTARY: Obamacare is turning doctors into bureaucratsBy Jeffrey Singer
March 08, 2014 12:00 am  • 

As a general surgeon with more than three decades of experience in private clinical practice, I can safely say Obamacare is the culmination of the fundamental changes I've seen in the way doctors practice medicine.

Unfortunately, these changes have been less progressive and more regressive, with medicine now the domain of pencil pushing rather than patient service.

This shift has been underway for decades. It began in the 1980s, when Medicare imposed price controls and a coding system on physicians who treated anyone over 65. The regulators believed that such standardization would lead to more accurate processing of Medicare claims.

Instead it made doctors and hospitals wedge their patients and services into predetermined, ill-fitting categories. Private insurers, starting in the late 1980s, began pegging their compensation contracts to the Medicare code-based fee schedule, effectively extending Medicare price controls into the private sector.

With the dawn of the 21st century, the bureaucrats behind Medicare decided to go a step further. The federal government imposed further regimentation on America's physicians through a centralized bureaucracy known as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services — the same bureaucracy now in charge of implementing Obamacare.

Using so-called “evidence-based medicine,” CMS instituted protocols based on statistically generalized — rather than individualized — outcomes in large population groups.

It is easy to standardize treatment protocols. It is impossible to standardize individual patients.

Patients should worry about standardized clinical models that ignore the vital nuances of their conditions. Even more, they should be alarmed that the protocols being used don't provide any measurable health benefits. Many were designed and implemented before any objective evidence existed as to their effectiveness. Bizarrely, many protocols are not “evidence based,” despite their name.

The spread of protocols and price controls have coincided with a steady ratcheting down of fees for doctors. Meanwhile, Medicare's regulatory burdens on physician practices continue to increase, adding on compliance costs. Independent doctors are increasingly selling their practices to hospitals, thus becoming hospital employees. As of 2011, fully 50 percent of the nation's doctors had become employees of someone else — either of hospitals, corporations, insurance companies or the government.

But this doesn't serve patients. The doctor-patient relationship worsens when doctors come to view patients as the hospitals' patients rather than their own.

Enter Obamacare. Because Medicare’s price controls ripple across the entire health care industry, any changes to its fiscal stability will affect nearly the entire medical profession. Yet in an attempt to keep Medicare fiscally stable (which it needs to be, with 10,000 Americans turning 65 every day), Obamacare sacrifices the patient by pushing doctors to the sidelines.

It does so through its “Accountable Care Organizations.” Under this system, hospitals, clinics, and health care providers are organized into teams that will get assigned large groups of Medicare patients. These teams are hemmed in on every side by the practice guidelines and protocols approved by Medicare.

Like in the 1980s, private insurance companies are following suit with non-Medicare versions of this system. In both cases, cost control and compliance with centrally planned practice guidelines dominate.

This means less doctor choice for patients. Once free to be creative and innovative in their own practices, doctors are becoming more like assembly line workers, constrained by rules and regulations.

I joined the medical profession because I want to serve patients, not fill out forms. Thousands of others feel the same way I do.

Thanks to Obamacare, this is harder than ever before. It’s no surprise that many of my generational peers in medicine have gone part-time, taken early retirement, or quit the medical profession for another field entirely. Others are starting cash-only medical practices that accept no Medicare, Medicaid or private insurance.

As these old-school, independent-thinking doctors leave, they are replaced by doctors who need to know more about regulations and red tape than medicine or bedside manner. The “care” in Obamacare’s name is thus little more than a broken promise. This affects us all—we will all be patients someday.

Dr. Jeffrey Singer practices general surgery in Phoenix, Ariz., and is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute. This piece is adapted from a piece that previously appeared in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. The opinions are the writer's.

Copyright 2014 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Follow The Times

Featured Businesses

Submit a Letter to Editor

We welcome letters from readers on any issue of public interest, and make every effort to publish as many as we can and in a timely manner. The Times will publish only one letter a month from a writer, and be sure to include your name, address and a telephone number for verification. Letters should be 150 words or less. They will be edited.

Letters may be submitted:
  • Via our submission form.
  • Via e-mail.
  • Via fax: (219) 933-3249 or (219) 465-7298
  • Via mail or by hand to our offices:
    • 601 45th Ave., Munster, IN 46321
    • 2080 N. Main St., Crown Point, IN 46307
    • 1111 Glendale Blvd., Valparaiso, IN 46383
    • 3410 Delta Dr., Portage, IN 46368
    • Please mark envelopes with "Attn: Letters"


Email Editorial Page Editor Doug Ross or call (219) 548-4360 or (219) 933-3357



Should the Indiana attorney general's office compel all Lake County municipalities to merge E-911 dispatch services?

View Results