MARK KIESLING: Like him or not, we know where Mourdock stands

2012-10-26T00:00:00Z 2012-12-20T21:25:33Z MARK KIESLING: Like him or not, we know where Mourdock stands
October 26, 2012 12:00 am

You've heard about this Richard Mourdock fella? Well, I kind of like him.

He's the chap from Indiana running for the U.S. Senate on the Republican ticket after he beat longtime Sen. Dick Lugar in the primary.

He's also the guy who has become a lightning rod in his party after he recently made some comments about abortion, rape and God.

Boy, that's a trifecta of doom that would find most pols running for the nearest fallout shelter.

Not Mourdock. He rushed in where angels fear to tread — but is he a fool? I don't think so.

I think he is honestly telling us what he thinks, rather than sugar-coating the nasty subject of abortion with high-sounding words and soothing pabulum.

"I came to realize life is that gift from God," Mourdock said. "And I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."

Here, we must part company. This is a fatalistic, deterministic view of life that negates any free will on the part of mankind."

Some, like Dr. Albert Schweitzer, will use free will for good. Others, like Adolf Hitler, will use it for evil.

Someone who believes God has "intended" conception to result from a rape must also, by logical extension, have God determining whether you should have toast or a bagel for breakfast and whether to go to Office Depot, Office Max or Staples.

Who wins the lottery? Who ends up in the pediatric cancer ward? Who gets the gold mine, and who gets the shaft? You get the idea.

The deniers of free will range from militant atheists to true believers. Please leave your tracts in the rack; I have seen your arguments, and have found them wanting.

But back to Mourdock specifically.

I said at the outset that I like him, and I do. It is a welcome change not to have to take your political machete and hack through the forest of obfuscation so many candidates plant to avoid having to expose their real selves.

It doesn't mean I care for his ideas, or endorse them, because I do not.

But what Mourdock has done is what everyone promises but few deliver: The unvarnished truth, like it or not, which gives us the ability to choose a candidate based on his or her merits or lack thereof.

It's sort of ironic that by coming out with his true feelings, he has given us back what he apparently does not believe in.

Free will.

The opinions are solely those of the writer. He can be reached at or (219) 933-4170.


Copyright 2014 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Follow The Times

Latest Local Offers

Need an Estimate for Septic or Sewer Problems? Call Jack & Vernon's Septic Service Today!

Call Jack & Vernon's Septic Service today for your estimat…

Featured Businesses

Submit a Letter to Editor

We welcome letters from readers on any issue of public interest, and make every effort to publish as many as we can and in a timely manner. The Times will publish only one letter a month from a writer, and be sure to include your name, address and a telephone number for verification. Letters should be 150 words or less. They will be edited.

Letters may be submitted:
  • Via our submission form.
  • Via e-mail.
  • Via fax: (219) 933-3249 or (219) 465-7298
  • Via mail or by hand to our offices:
    • 601 45th Ave., Munster, IN 46321
    • 2080 N. Main St., Crown Point, IN 46307
    • 1111 Glendale Blvd., Valparaiso, IN 46383
    • 3410 Delta Dr., Portage, IN 46368
    • Please mark envelopes with "Attn: Letters"


Email Editorial Page Editor Doug Ross or call (219) 548-4360 or (219) 933-3357



Do you support a 10-cent tax increase for Lan-Oak Park District?

View Results