Search / Found (122)
It is essential employers prohibit the use of biased slang or slurs in the workplace. This is true whether the discriminating words relate to age, race, religion, gender, natural origin, disability or any other protected class.
We have noted several times it is of great importance to employers to completely and accurately document performance problems. The consequence of not doing so was apparent in a recent case.
Indiana is in the minority of states which, on a limited basis, permits employees to carry firearms to work.
In prior articles, we have noted that when an employee raises a discrimination claim (age, race, national origin, etc.), the employer can defend itself by establishing a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the decision. When this occurs, the employee must establish that the stated reaso…
The number of claims of religious discrimination has grown significantly over the past several years. Within these claims are those relating to an applicant’s or employee’s dress or grooming.
In the past, we have discussed the Uniformed Services and Reemployment Rights Act, also known as USERRA.
The Better Government Association recently reported on an employment-related case, which is worth reviewing.
Should women be paid the same wages as men for equal work? Should women be paid the same wages as men for jobs that require equal skill, effort and responsibility – or that are performed under similar working conditions?
The Fair Labor Standards Act addresses the topics of using trainees and training existing employees. Both concepts are rule driven.
As we have noted in the past, Title VI prohibits employers from discriminating against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on that individual’s race.
The compensability of meal and break periods is covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act. Three basic rules apply.
Sometimes, it seems like the sports section is more like a legal update. Recently, you may have followed the story about the Miami Dolphins.
Usually, we discuss one case per article. Today, we deviate from the norm by discussing three different matters:
When accused of discriminating against an employee in a protected class (gender, race, etc.), an employer defends by asserting a legitimate non-discriminating/non-retaliatory business reason for its decision.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of religion. The law requires a covered employer to provide a reasonable accommodation for an employee’s request to participate in a religious observance or practice if an accommodation would not ca…
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits discrimination based on “pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions.”
As we have noted in the past, Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against an individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment based on that individual’s race.
Accurate and current job descriptions are of great importance to employers. This is especially true under the Americans With Disabilities Act. The ADA protects qualified individuals with disabilities who are able to perform the essential duties of their jobs, with or without reasonable accom…
In our last article, we analyzed two cases which addressed the creation of a hostile work environment. One more case in this trilogy adds additional insight on this issue.
The law does not guarantee a perfect workplace. Courts do not want to be super-human resource departments, potentially reviewing every slight felt by employees.
As noted in the past, federal law prohibits employment discrimination based on religion.
One given principle of the Americans With Disabilities Act provides that employee medical information obtained from “medical examinations and inquiries” must be treated as a confidential medical record. The issue is what is an inquiry?
In order to be protected under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the employee must be able to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without reasonable accommodations.
Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, a covered employer must give a qualified employee FMLA leave to care for the employee's family member(s) with a serious health condition.
In previous articles, we have discussed the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. A recent case held that under USERRA, an employer can terminate a returning veteran.
Pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), in order to be protected, the employee must be qualified to perform the duties of her job.
In our last article, we discussed age discrimination claims. Today, we will examine one key defense available to employers.
As the workforce ages, we can expect to see an increase in age discrimination claims in the workplace. A recent case shows how these claims can arise.
In our last article, we discussed whether transferring a qualified disabled employee to a vacant job position was a required reasonable accommodation under the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, or the ADA, an employee with a disability must be able to perform the essential functions of her job, with or without accommodations. Determining a job's "essential functions" can be critical.
The Family and Medical Leave Act is one of the most difficult statutes for employers to work with.
As we have noted in the past, employees can allege hostile work environment claims based on race or national origin.
Immigration reform has been a hotly contested issue. President Obama's recent executive order further focused attention on the status of individuals who are illegally in the United States.
Often two different claims may appear in the same Title VII gender discrimination case. The first claim is that because of wrongful discrimination, the employee suffered an adverse employment action.
Common sense would seem to suggest regular attendance is an essential function of every job. This is an important concept.
Surveys suggest a substantial percentage of employers routinely use criminal background checks when hiring new employees. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commssion has just issued new guidelines, which limit this use.
In a typical retaliation case, an employee will claim an adverse employment decision, often termination, was in retaliation for the employee having exercised a protected right.
In order to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act, or ADA, employers must carefully consider all requests for reasonable accommodations from employees with disabilities.
President Barack Obama's announcement that our soldiers in Iraq will return by year's end refocuses attention on the re-employment rights of employees who were called into active duty.
The evidence is in; the number of religious discrimination claims is on the increase. Surveys of employees indicate a significant percentage of employees identify religious bias in the workplace, and that at least 50 percent believe the bias negatively impacts performance and productivity.
Recent columns have noted that recent amendments to the Americans With Disabilities Act, called ADA, have made it easier for employees to claim they are protected by it.
For employers, it is difficult to comply with just one of the employment statutes we often discuss. Just think how difficult it is when the employer must coordinate two or three statutes at the same time.
In previous articles, we have noted that claims of retaliation are increasing. Employers face great risk in these claims, especially when an adverse employment action falls close in time to an employee's exercise of a protected right.
In the 17th century French fable, The Monkey and the Cat, a monkey convinces a cat to pull chestnuts from a fire. The cat burns his paws.
To prevail on a sex discrimination claim, a female employee must demonstrate that similarly situated men, subject to the same company policy, were treated more favorably.
Same-sex sexual harassment claims are rare. However, this type of harassment can be unlawful. An employer will be held liable if the victim's gender is a contributing factor for the offensive conduct.
There was a time when most litigation arose at intersections, when cars, and later attorneys, collided. Now, unfortunately, the workplace is the most fertile place of litigation.
Same-sex sexual harassment claims are rare. However, this type of harassment can be unlawful.
In a sexual harassment case, the conduct complained of must be "unwelcomed." Can this element ever be proven in a case where a male employee complains he is being harassed by a female co-worker?
In order to establish her claims of a sexual based hostile work environment by non-supervisory co-workers, a female employee needs to show that she was subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment and that the harassment was based on her sex.
Follow The Times
Receive 85% Off a New Patient Exam and X-rays - Now Only $44!
Our goal is to make your car buying experience the best possib…
Looking for a new health food store?? Your search is over!! Click here to see what Herb Thyme Market has to offer!!
WE ARE YOUR "HOMETOWN" HEALTH FOOD STORE! We offer personalize…
Stop by Brad's today!
Who do you support for Porter County commissioner?