aliasooze

Comments

If they can't control crime in a city with 26,000 people, with the amount of money and resources they have without marshall law we are all in serious trouble. How many swat teams does a city that size need?
Them not being able to control crime actually enforces the need to have guns.

February 05, 2013 11:09 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
This might put it all together for you. Just taking orders and saying "Don't be frightened. We are the good guys." isn't going to reassure Americans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PGJyyhPjNU

February 05, 2013 10:55 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
Paragould Arkansas, a town with the population of 26,000 has enacted martial law. They are cancelling town hall meeting citing “public safety concerns”.
Swat teams will be asking for everyones ID and be carrying AR-15s. According to the Arkansas Times, the mayor said patrolling police would not “constantly” be carrying assault rifles. Although announced to begin in January, no SWAT patrols have begun in Paragould yet.

February 05, 2013 9:42 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
Ollie North was asked about FEMA camps on the stand during the Iran Contra trial. See:REX 84. Also on You Tube.

February 05, 2013 9:21 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
"New York State Resistance...prime for something like that" on You Tube. Stop by and show them you care.

February 04, 2013 6:31 pm on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
No thanks. So many documents have been declassified now and they aren't trying to hide it. Check out agenda 21, fema camps, plastic coffins and codex alimentarius.
Someone even carved their intentions in stone on the Georgia guidestones.
Nice try but David Icke didn't make up Tavistock. He offered an opinion which doesn't dismiss the fact that it exists.
Reading is your friend. Try it. There are lots of You Tube videos if that's too much for you.
Monsanto is agenda 21's newest member. Have a nice day.

February 04, 2013 3:16 pm on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
The National Sheriff's Association announced they will not support unconstitutional gun laws. Is that drivel better?
Why do you try so hard? Why call people names? Just because you associate one name (David Icke) to something doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. IANSA ANSA, Tavistock, the UN and NATO are all real. Do you think people are still falling for that "You're paranoid", "Your're a conspiracy therorist"? stuff. Google and other search engines work for them too,
Mr. Icke has some wild beliefs but to dismiss everything he says shows you have a small mind. Or maybe by associating Tavistock to his name you think people will not look. What's your motivation? What do you think Tavistock is exactly, because it isn't a theory, it's real.

February 04, 2013 1:19 pm on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
Action Network on Small Arms
That led me to look up ANSA small arms.
Lots of info there too.
The harder you try, the more foolish you look. I don't care what you or anyone else believes. I think it's important that people know who and what is working behind the scenes. We've been too passive for too long.

February 04, 2013 11:06 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
New thought for today.I found this on You Tube.

Tavistock Institute for Global Manipulation

February 04, 2013 10:46 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control
You are welcome.
This from the Urban Dictionary.I thought it was mostly for slang. The word is getting around on the internet everywhere. This is a worldwide gun grab. Please pass the word.

The IANSA network includes Canadian gun control organizations such as the Coalition for Gun Control. IANSA is an international organization of NGOS that want total civilian disarmament. They have petitioned the United Nations to enact strategies to achieve this goal, to remove all "small arms and light weapons", including civilian hunting and sporting firearms. Their supposide reason for this is to promote government stability while simutaneously reducing firearms violence within their populations. They do not consider government genoicide of disarmed citizens to be a concern. Nor do they consider the inability of a civilian to protect themselves from criminals a concern- self defense is not a human right under United Nations charter, largely due to the work of IANSA.

IANSA does not reflect the will of the people, rather the will of their funders: governments. "IANSA’s work has been supported by funders including the Governments of Belgium, Sweden and Norway, as well as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Compton Foundation, Ploughshares Fund, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Samuel Rubin Foundation and Christian Aid." (wikipedia)

IANSA needs to keep out of the United Nation's business.

For some reason IANSA feels that all citizens should be potential defenseless victims to crime and tyrany.

"IANSA comes largely from five agencies of small to medium-size governments: The Belgian Ministry for Development Cooperation; the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the United Kingdom Department for International Development; and the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The funding of IANSA by governments raises the question of collusion." (1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes)

February 04, 2013 10:11 am on Obama overstepping constitution on gun control