Follow The Times
Latest Local Offers
Want to Improve Your Child’s Social Skills and Behavior? Pick Up Your Summer Camp 2013 Information Packet Now
Summer Camp 2013 information may be picked up at the Academy n…
Kovenz Memorial now has QR code memorials. Find more information here…
Kovenz Memorial currently offers QR codes for placement on you…
Every day is a Holiday! Visit Lightning Fireworks today!
Stop in and visit Lightning Fireworks today!
National Video
Most Popular
In Today's Paper
Poll
Loading…
Should Indiana require ignition interlock devices to be installed upon conviction for drunken driving?
Recent Blog Posts
- LIVE: RailCats vs. Wingnuts in first early game of the season16 hours ago
- PREP BASEBALL: Roosevelt forfeits sectional game before postseason begins18 hours ago
- FIRST PITCH: Opening day, Michelle FieldsMay 16, 2013 7:30 pm
- LIVE: RailCats season opener vs. Lincoln SaltdogsMay 16, 2013 4:30 pm














Please Wait…
Regarding the approval comment, I agree that this may be an assumption on my part. However, I will stand by my own experience in this area and say that most of what gets called "racism" in today's racially charged culture is really more about trying to change hearts and thoughts. Admittedly, there exist some issues of stubborn racism, but I think it a foolish endeavor to waste one's life trying to get others to like you/approve of you for whatever reason. This is unnecessary in my opinion. I do not, as a black man, strive to get non-blacks, or anyone for that matter to approve of me. My esteem is not at all affected by moronic racially charged comments by anyone because they do not now, and never will define me. This makes me completely free. My esteem is based on the fact that I am created in the image of my Maker-God. If anyone doesn't like that, then that is not my problem but theirs and I refuse to take on their problem.
Finally, as for the quote concerning good politics to oppose the "black guy" I have to simple things to say. First, I never would suggest that one person speaks for either party; all have a right to their opinion. Secondly, no one ever had to say the "white guy" in the White House because prior to our current President, they have all been white.
The GOP does criticize him for his policies, as Democrats criticized Bush and other GOP leaders for policy positions. In my opinion, the criticism leveled at President Obama often is interpreted as despise due to the aforementioned prism of race that which far too many Americans view circumstances regarding our President. The power of free speech is that it extends to every citizen, period. Someone much smarter than me once said that America is advanced citizenship. To enjoy personal freedom of speech means that you must defend the right of those to speak freely that which you would give your life opposing.
Finally, I am a bit baffled by your question since my original point dealt with why many blacks may have supported the President rather than why the GOP might oppose him.
Secondly, Mr. Roddy and many who feel like he does, also see it as a cultural duty to publicly protect the President, while it is likely that private misgivings exist. This is because the support for then candidate Obama germinated from blackness and not policy. In order to maintain "authentic blackness" it was very necessary to support the first black candidate with a real chance to be elected to the highest office in the land. It did not matter that he was as much white as he was black; all that was necessary was that he identify as black. (This worked to the President's advantage with whites as well-but that is another story) It is very likely that in Mr. Roddy's mind, shaped by feeling victimized, his ethnic pride was at stake. Therefore, in order to authenticate and value his own ethnicity, it was crucial to support the president at all cost-even when all logic says he has erred. This is not a matter of Mr. Roddy imagining racism-he really believes that criticism of the President is racially based because he interprets his own life through the prism of his ethnicity.
Finally, we must view Mr. Roddy's comments in light of the fact that his definition of respect, skewed by feelings of victimization, means that all criticism is a direct attack on what makes a person who they are-their ethnic distinction, rather than their character. Mr. Roddy likely defines his own life in this manner-he is black before anything else. This in effect is a prison of sorts, a bondage that only allows the individual to view their life and world through the color of their skin, as well as those around them. This also results from a lifetime of feeling victimized by those of a different, perhaps even more (perceived if not real) powerful group. It is important for my thinking white or non-black brothers and sisters to note that Mr. Roddy is only acting upon the impulse that he knows and one with which he is comfortable. To view life outside of ethnicity, means that one must begin to look at self in terms of character-this also means one must view others in like manner. Hence, one would then begin to see the successes and failures of leaders in a different more realistic light.
The cure for Mr. Roddy and others like him is spiritual in nature. I know, because once upon a time I was there. I had to look at myself beyond my skin color and begin to define myself by my character-of which I am still developing daily to the good. The only way to be free of victimization is to forgive those whom you perceive to have victimized you-even if they have not asked or especially if you have no direct proof of their malice toward you. Mr. Roddy and others must understand that it is unnecessary to live for the approval of anyone other than your Maker. This is the essence of true freedom. I hope this helps all understand the roots of letters like this; and I hope we can eventually have meaningful dialogue with the goal of mutual understanding in mind. Peace to all.